Pechman removed the class-action status last month after determining that the plaintiffs hadn't proven Microsoft's marketing campaign artificially inflated PC prices. Lawyers for the plaintiffs are now asking the judge to certify the class based on two narrower groups of PC buyers.
That new certification request was the subject of today's hearing. Microsoft told the judge that the case doesn't merit that status because of the widely varying circumstances under which people bought the machines.
Whichever way Pechman rules on that issue, it looks as the upcoming trial in the case, set for April 13, will probably be delayed.
That's because Jeffrey Thomas, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, told the judge today that they would probably take the issue to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals if she doesn't recertify the class. On the other hand, if the judge rules in the plaintiffs' favor on the class certification, the procedures necessary for notifying the potential class members would also require the trial to be delayed.
Stephen Rummage, a lawyer representing Microsoft in the case, told the judge that the company is nonetheless prepared to go to trial over the claims of the six named plaintiffs. Rummage expressed confidence in the company's prospects at trial.